Derek Collett |
👍
Sat 25 Mar 2006, 11:18 Igor - Thank you for your apology, which I am happy to accept, and for having the good grace to admit you were wrong with regard to cycling in Sheep Street. "Tone of voice" can be difficult to convey on a forum such as this so if I misunderstood your humorous intent then I apologise. Likewise I do not think I have been particularly aggressive on this topic: if you look back at my previous posts I think you would have to accept that my views have generally been very reasonable. However, I will react strongly if I feel I have been unfairly attacked or if someone espouses views that in my opinion are inflammatory or dangerous. If I have been a little over-vigorous towards you in the past then I apologise again, although I should point out that your attitude towards me has often been highly provoking! Having said all of that, I really must take issue with you when you say that I am anti-cycling. As Kate has pointed out (and thank you for your support Kate!) I have displayed very strong pro-cycling views throughout my previous posts in this thread. Much as I hate having to blow my own trumpet, I set out below my cycling credentials as I see them: 1. I have cycled regularly (i.e. at least twice a week) for the last 30 years. So ask yourself Igor, does that sound like the typical profile of a cyclephobe? As I have said before, although I am strongly pro-cycling I am vehemently opposed to cyclists who I believe bring the activity into disrepute by cycling illegally, dangerously or antisocially. I have good personal reasons for this. Some years ago in London, I was crossing Oxford Street on foot when I was flattened by a cyclist who was cycling on the wrong side of the road. I had nearly a week off work as a result of my injuries and was still in pain from them several months later. Whilst living in Headington, I once had a contretemps with a cyclist who was riding his bike on the pavement on a Saturday morning when it was thronged with shoppers. When I criticised him, he threatened me with violence. When I saw the cyclist in Sheep Street (and I don't know whether it was you or someone else), my concern was that a car travelling down Brown's Lane and then turning left could easily have hit him and he then wouldn't have had a leg to stand on, either legally or literally (joke!). I also believe that cycling on the pavement is potentially dangerous because although I am capable of jumping out of the way as a pedestrian, young children and, particularly, doddery pensioners may not be able to. I would have thought that given the high number of very infirm pensioners in Charlbury, cycling on the pavements should be a complete no-no. Finally Igor, please do NOT stop cycling around Charlbury. I do it several times a week and whilst the traffic restrictions do sometimes cause me irritation they are not as bad as all that. I think we have to stick together as cyclists, maintain a visible presence on the streets of the town and raise our profile by cycling carefully and responsibly. Only then will we be in a position to change some of the cycle-unfriendly aspects of living in Charlbury. |