Our Evenlode - rather distressing environment article
| Malcolm Blackmore |
👍
1
Fri 24 Feb 2023, 14:02 Pasted-in below is text of an article about the pollution of all our rivers. Does anyone know what level the Evenlode is? And any significant sources? Where does our drinking water come from? Below full article> ------------------- ‘Forever chemicals’ mean England’s waters will miss pollution targets for decades Helena Horton and Sandra Laville Jesmond Dene, Newcastle upon Tyne Jesmond Dene, Newcastle upon Tyne. All of England’s rivers fail to meet pollution standards. Photograph: geordiepics/Alamy The government is investigating and mapping out the sources of dangerous “forever chemicals” present in our waterways. But England will not meet its targets for waterways having good chemical status by 2027, the government admits, in part because of the PFAS “forever chemicals” in our rivers. Officials admit there is no way for them to remove PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), some of which are classified as uPBT (ubiquitous, persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic) substances. The chemicals do not break down in the environment, build up in the body and may be toxic. They form a family of about 10,000 chemicals valued for their non-stick and detergent properties. High levels of PFAS in England’s waters mean that far from meeting good chemical status by 2027, in many areas standards for PFAS will not be met until 2063. This week a big new mapping project has revealed that these chemicals have been found at high levels at thousands of sites across the UK and Europe. In 2021 the Environment Agency admitted in a report: “Monitoring data for rivers, lakes, groundwater, estuaries and coastal waters suggests it is likely that PFAS is widely present in English surface waters and groundwater.” Another document from the agency found: “PFOS is a widespread environmental contaminant. Our monitoring programme in surface waters has reported the presence of PFOS in all fish sampled from fresh, estuarine and coastal waters. “Measured concentrations in fish ranged from below the environmental quality standard (EQS) to up to four times greater than the biota EQS.” The government has said that the UK will not meet the water framework directive target of all waterways meeting good chemical status by 2027, because of PFAS chemicals. The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Officials told the Guardian that it is recognised that there is no feasible technical solution to removing them entirely and that they will take time to naturally drop to required levels. At the moment, all of England’s rivers fail to meet pollution tests because of chemical and sewage pollution. The government said: “Since the 2000s we have taken action to increase monitoring and support a ban or restrict specific PFAS both domestically and internationally. We are undertaking investigations to understand and map out the sources of PFAS, using additional controls to reduce their risk to the environment. “We are also taking significant steps to improve our water environment, including new legal targets on pollution, tougher regulation and enforcement, and a requirement on water companies to deliver their largest ever infrastructure investment.” |