Colin Critch
(site admin) |
👍
Sun 21 Jan 2007, 19:42 I suspect real answer is this. The manufactures that make incandescent bulbs are not going to subvert their own revenue streams. So if a Low-energy light bulb lasts 12 times longer, your customers will not comeback as frequently as they do with an incandescent bulb. So why not make is x times as expensive than a tungsten bulb. The customer saves on electricity costs, less CO2 is emitted and the manufacturers is happy and can survive to make bulbs for another day. Most manufacturers want to stay in business and even make a profit. The Low-energy bulbs have many more components and are more difficult to manufacture than an incandescent light bulb hence the manufacturing cost is higher. The supply chain rules also put up the price. The higher the price the more number of middle men you have selling the bulbs on. Just for the full picture it is always a balance between pollution and energy and cost. On a brighter note. We live in an imperfect world where doing the right thing does not necessary give financial rewards or a fanfare of well deserved trumpets. I hope this answers your questions.
|