Rod Evans |
👍
Fri 29 Nov, 18:46 (last edited on Fri 29 Nov, 18:47) I knew someone would put me right Steve - I didn't fail maths and physics 'O' levels for nothing yaknow! It's the height and width of the bridge arches and the 2 flood relief channels (without which some of us would be in deep doo-doos - or possibly these days deep in doo-doos) which of course determine the volume of water flowing through, not the width of the flood across the field. So let's just agree there was a Heck of a Lot of Water headed downstream on Monday! |
Steve Jones |
👍
1
Thu 28 Nov, 11:27 (last edited on Mon 2 Dec, 13:18) I don't know how you have done your calculations, but if it's 100 metres x 1 metres by 0.5 metres per second (about 1.1 mph), that's 50 cubic metres a second. The average discharge rate of the Evenlode is 3.7 cubic metres per second (222 cubic metres per minute). |
Rod Evans |
👍
Thu 28 Nov, 11:06 ... on Monday hit the highest level I've seen it in 10 years. Now, I'm neither a mathemetician nor a physicist but try this, speed and distances etc estimated entirely by eye! 100m across (from Mill Lane to cricket field). Average depth 1m (in the main river up to 4m); Speed of 1m3 every 2 seconds. So, 30m3 per minute, or 1800 per hour or 43,200 over 24 hours - or 43,200,000 litres passing through. An olympic swimming pool contains 2,500,000 litres. Of course there are huge variables here - the rise and fall, and different flow speeds (much faster in the main channel) for a start. And various solids in there somewhere! But who can come up with something more accurate?? |
You must log in before you can post a reply.